You can find key information about how we read and spell, and how to teach reading and spelling, here:
-
Three presentations by David Kilpatrick at the 2017 Reading in the Rockies conference are available free online (scroll down to find them) and should (IMHO) be compulsory viewing for professionals involved in teaching reading and spelling skills.
- Language at the Speed of Sight by Mark Seidenberg.
- Early Reading Instruction: What science really tells us about how to teach reading, by Diane McGuinness. By the same author is Language Development and Learning to Read, now out of print, but available as a free pdf here.
- Reading in the Brain by Stanislas Dehaene. Watch him on video here and here.
- Essentials of Assessing, Preventing and Overcoming Reading Difficulties by David Kilpatrick. Videos of David and other experts can be found at The Reading League.
- Articles by Louisa Moats (many available free online – just search by title and author). Two video lectures by Dr Moats are here and here.
- Proust and the Squid by Maryanne Wolf.
- AUSPELD and its state-based affiliates have research information on their websites, or try the easy-to-read Understanding Learning Difficulties: A Guide for Parents website.
- Learning Difficulties Australia’s website
- The Five from Five website
- The Children of the Code website
- This 2014 Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of treatment approaches for children and adults with reading difficulties.
- Outside the Square’s Australian films about dyslexia, now free on Youtube.
- Association for Direct Instruction
- LD Online, and in particular this article.
- Developmental Disorders of Language and Literacy Network – online network of professionals who want to close the gap between research and practice in literacy teaching.
- SpellTalk listserve: US-based professional discussion group about spelling, and a good source of information about current research.
Literacy statistics
How literate are Australians? Recent large-scale international studies suggest that far too many Australians are struggling with reading and spelling. Click here for more information and links to these studies.
National Inquiries
National inquiries into the teaching of reading have been held in Australia, the UK and the USA.
All the reports are online so you can read them yourself – click here for the links and what I regard as a few key excerpts.
Dyslexia reports
Dyslexia is part of Specific Learning Disability in the latest edition of the diagnostic manual used by medical and allied professions (DSM-5). In Australia and the UK there have been recent reports describing about the difficulties and needs of people with decoding problems. Click here for more information and the relevant links.
Literature reviews
A useful literature review on literacy-teaching in Australia was published by ACER in 2002, called Closing the gap between research and practice – foundations for the acquisition of literacy.
Scottish Studies – Clackmannanshire and West Dunbartonshire
Two key, long-term studies into literacy-teaching methodology in Scotland have been published in recent years and are worth highlighting – one conducted in Clackmannanshire and one in West Dunbartonshire. Click here for a brief overview and links to their reports.
Policy papers
Two of Australia’s most respected reading scientists wrote a paper in 2007 called Learning to Read in Australia, which remains very relevant.
Follow
email
Hi Alison,
I enjoyed your talk at the LDA presentation of Maryanne Wolf. I remember you showed a review of research, from memory, about Levelled Literacy Intervention showing that it does not make much of an impact. Could you please send me this link?
I am an LDA consultant member who is doing Year One intervention in a school that has purchased all the F&P kits (against my recommendation). I have said it does not have good results and the head of English would like to see where I’ve got that idea from because she has only heard positive things!!
Kind regards,
Helen
Hi Helen, I put the links to the things I was talking about at the Wolf seminar in this blog post: http://www.spelfabet.com.au/2016/09/filling-the-gaps.
The F&P publicity all says that it’s research/evidence-based, but if you look at THEIR OWN RESEARCH (published on their website but not in a peer-reviewed journal, so whether we really call it research anyway is arguable), it found that improvements that could be attributed to the program were not statistically significant, see http://www.heinemann.com/fountasandpinnell/research/lliefficacystudyreport2012.pdf. But they bury this in a lot of verbiage explaining this away, and a lot of glossy marketing, because they know teachers are not taught how to critically evaluate research.
All the best, Alison C